Presses de Sciences Po

http://www.pressesdesciencespo.fr/en/livre/?GCOI=27246100795140
Revue française de science politique 64-4, août 2014
Title Revue française de science politique 64-4, août 2014
Subtitle La judiciarisation dans le gouvernement du religieux
Edition First Edition
Author et al.
ISSN 00352950
Publisher Presses de Sciences Po
Audience 06 Professional and scholarly
CLIL (Version 2013-2019) 3283 SCIENCES POLITIQUES
Title First Published 29 August 2014
Subject Scheme Identifier Code      93 Thema subject category: JPA


Format Paperback
Nb of pages 225 p.
ISBN-10 2-7246-3371-7
ISBN-13 978-2-7246-3371-9
GTIN13 (EAN13) 9782724633719
Publication Date 30 August 2014
Product Content Text (eye-readable)
Main content page count 225
Dimensions 16 x 24 x 1.2 cm
Weight 378 gr
List Price 24.00 €
 

Description

Claire de Galembert et Matthias Koenig
GOVERNING RELIGION WITH JUDGES
While the comparative study of secularism has become a thriving field of research, the precise political processes underlying the governance of religion is still a field to be srutinized. Such processes cannot be understood without paying attention to the judicial arena. Building upon the burgeoning literature on the judicialization of politics, this article highlights that practices of social movement actors and public policy-makers are embedded not only in national constitutional traditions but also in global rights discourses and international judicial frameworks. Introducing case studies on France, Quebec, Switzerland, Turkey, Israel and Malaysia, assembled in this special issue, it lays out an array of methodological strategies and analytical perspectives that allow studying the multi-level dynamics, complex power configurations and ambivalent consequences of governing religion with judges.

Claire de Galembert
FORCE THE LAW TO SPEAK AGAINST THE BURQA. A JUDICIAL POLITICS À LA FRANÇAISE?
This article traces the controversy generated by the political enterprise to legislate against full veils in the public space in France. The decisionmade in 2010 by the Conseil Constitutionnel validating the law and putting an end to the constitutional controversy could be interpreted as the byproduct of both a legicentric tradition and the French assertive secularism. Yet, stating this tells nothing about how this decision was made possible. Delving into the lawmaking process, the article shows how seriously the constitutional law has been taken into account and follows the way political stakeholders and legal experts have disputed and adjusted with one another. It highlights the virtue of process-tracing analysis to understand, how constitutional law frames the political game and determines the path of the law, and conversely how political and legal stakeholders manage to enlist the law to their political enterprise, forcing it to speak against full veils.

Éléonore Lépinard
STYLES OF JUDICIAL DELIBERATION AND THE REGULATION OF MINORITY RELIGIOUS PRACTICES IN FRANCE AND CANADA
This article proposes an internal perspective on judicial traditions to explain judicial decisions in favor of accommodating or prohibiting minority religious practices such as wearing religious dress in two liberal states with opposing judicial traditions: France and Canada. By comparing the two styles of legal writing and judicial traditions, I show how the Canadian judge, thanks to legal techniques such as contextual analysis, tends to include the minority point of view in its decisions, leading to greater accommodation, while the French judge tends to privilege the majority point of view, leading to the exclusion of the religious minority perspective from its decisions and to subsequent prohibitions of religious dress.

Hervé Rayner et Bernard Voutat
JUDICIALIZATION VS DIRECT DEMOCRACY. THE BAN ON MINARETS IN SWITZERLAND
Launched by UDC representatives with the aim of circumventing political and judicial decisions made at both local and national levels, the 2009 federal popular initiative calling for a ban on the construction of minarets rekindled the stigmatization of Muslims living in Switzerland. Within the prevalent institutional configuration it moreover revived controversies surrounding issues such as direct democracy versus fundamental rights, or "the will of the people" versus "the power of the judges" whether national or international. "Judicialization" is a polysemous concept. It will not be understood here as the transfer to the courts of matters of political significance – in this instance the public regulation of religion – but as a process of juridification (or juridicalization) in which court rulings were constantly anticipated in the political debate provoked by the popular initiative.

Élise Massicard
THE JUDICIALIZATION OF THE ALEVI ISSUE, FROM TURKEY TO EUROPE
The judicialization of the Alevi issue in three judicial spaces – Turkey, Germany where numerous Alevis have settled, and the ECHR – shows that there is no judicial globalization, defined as a standardization of doctrines, case law, and networks of actors on an international scale. In each context, courts are mobilized by various actors and for different reasons, and lead to various decisions. However, there are circulations and a complex play of cross references between those levels. This, in turn, impacts the way state-religion relationships are negotiated : the normative framework and case law linked to the transnational field of human rights but also to rights obtained in other national contexts provide opportunities for demands by religious minorities, while also shaping the way they can be claimed for in the judicial field.

Ran Hirschl
CONSTITUTIONAL COURTS AS RELIGION-HARNESSING AGENTS. LESSONS FROM ISRAEL AND MALAYSIA
In this paper I examine the evolving role of constitutional law and courts as religion-harnessing agents in Israel and Malaysia – two complex constitutional settings, “ethnic democracies” by some classifications – that occupy the largely uncharted middle-ground between a strict separation of religion and state, and a full-fledged “constitutional theocracy”. As I show, a combination of instrumentalist and systemic factors, most notably the embedded “statist” inclination of the constitutional domain, generate landmark jurisprudence that supports a nationalized, state-endorsed variant of religion and at the same time disarms religion of its radical edge and brings it under constitutional check. As a result, the constitutional domain in these and other similarly situated countries has become an attractive arena for those who oppose the expansion of religion-based morality beyond the boundaries of the canonical national meta-narrative.

Contents

LA JUDICIARISATION DANS LE GOUVERNEMENT DU RELIGIEUX
Gouverner le religieux avec les juges

Introduction
Claire de Galembert, Matthias Koenig

Forcer le droit à parler contre la burqa
Une judicial politics à la française ?
Claire de Galembert

Écriture juridique et régulation du religieux minoritaire
En France et au Canada
Éléonore Lépinard

La judiciarisation à l'épreuve de la démocratie directe
L’interdiction de construire des minarets en Suisse
Hervé Rayner, Bernard Voutat

La judiciarisation contrastée de la question alévie
De la Turquie à l’Europe
Élise Massicard

Les cours constitutionnelles, agents de la domestication étatique du religieux
Les enseignements d’Israël et de la Malaisie
Ran Hirschl

CHRONIQUE BIBLIOGRAPHIQUE

LECTURES WÉBÉRIENNES
La domination de Max Weber en français : éléments d’appréciation critique
François Chazel

De la cage d’acier au réenchantement du monde, Max Weber en tension
Patrice Duran

LECTURES CRITIQUES

L’énigme soviétique
Philippe de Lara

Penser historiquement la gouvernance globale
Pierre Grosser

Trois ans après les révoltes, bilan et perspectives de la recherche sur le monde arabe
Pierre France

La démocratie boréale existe-t-elle ?
Michel Hastings

Démocratie et élection
Olivier Ihl

L’élection présidentielle française de 2012, une élection normale ?
Julien Audemard

La communication politique
Grégory Derville

COMPTES RENDUS
Jean-Pascal Daloz, Rethinking Social Distinction
Sylvie Octobre
Gianfranco Pasquino, Marta Regalia, Marco Valbruzzi (a cura di), Quarant’anni di scienza politica in Italia
Christophe Roux
Alistair Cole, Sophie Meunier, Vincent Tiberj (eds), Developments in French Politics.
Clément Viktorovitch
Catherine Achin, Laure Bereni (dir.), Dictionnaire genre & science politique. Concepts, objets, problèmes
Pierre Muller
Robert J. Jackson, Global Politics in the 21st Century
Jean Leca
Jonas Tallberg, Thomas Sommerer, Theresa Squatrito, Christer Jönsson, The Opening Up of International Organizations. Transnational Access in Global Governance
Guillaume Devin
Christopher J. Fettweis, The Pathologies of Power. Fear, Honor, Glory, and Hubris in U.S. Foreign Policy
Barthélémy Courmont
Judith G. Kelley, Monitoring Democracy. When International Election Observation Works and Why It Often Fails
Damien Larramendy
Edward L. Gibson, Boundary Control. Subnational Authoritarianism in Federal Democracies
Sara Casella Colombeau
Miguel A. Centeno, Agustín E. Ferraro (eds), State and Nation Making in Latin America and Spain. Republics of the Possible
Paula López Caballero
Georges Couffignal, La nouvelle Amérique latine. Laboratoire politique de l’Occident
Frédéric Louault
Diana Kapiszewski, High Courts and Economic Governance in Argentina and Brazil
Melina Rocha Lukic, Fernando Fontainha
Anna Colin Lebedev, Le coeur politique des mères. Analyse du mouvement des mères de soldats en Russie
Clémentine Fauconnier
Donatella della Porta, Manuela Caiani, Social Movements & Europeanization
Arnaud Lacheret
Christopher J. Bickerton, European integration. From Nation-States to Member States
Kevin Parthenay
Anthony Giddens, Turbulent and Mighty Continent. What Future for Europe ?
Hugo Canihac
Cas Mudde, Cristóbal Rovira Kaltwasser (eds), Populism in Europe and the Americas. Threat or Corrective for Democracy ?
Oscar Mazzoleni
Thomas Risse, Stephen C. Ropp, Kathryn Sikkink (eds), The Persistent Power of Human Rights. From Commitment to Compliance
Robert Harmsen
Christopher Adolph, Bankers, Bureaucrats, and Central Bank Politics. The Myth of Neutrality
Clément Fontan
Brendan J. Doherty, The Rise of the President’s Permanent Campaign
Christophe Cloutier
Stella M. Rouse, Latinos in the Legislative Process. Interests and Influence
Marc Milet
Claire de Galembert, Olivier Rozenberg, Cécile Vigour (dir.), Faire parler le Parlement. Méthodes et enjeux de l’analyse des débats parlementaires pour les sciences sociales
Guillaume Marrel
Martha J. Bailey, Sheldon Danziger (eds), Legacies of the War on Poverty
Élisa Chelle
Stéphane Dufoix, Carine Guerassimoff, Anne de Tinguy (dir.), Loin des yeux, près du coeur. Les États et leurs expatriés
Riva Kastoryano
Abel François, Julien Navarro (dir.), Le cumul des mandats en France : causes et conséquences
Pierre Sadran
David Gouard, La Banlieue rouge. Ceux qui restent et ce qui change
Sébastien Bauvet
Michel Offerlé, Les Patrons des patrons. Histoire du Medef
Jean-Claude Daumas
Pierre Brana, Du syndicalisme au politique. Regard intérieur sur la CGT, le PSU et le PS
Laurent Willemez
François Hourmant, Arnauld Leclerc (dir.), Les Intellectuels et le pouvoir. Déclinaisons et mutations
Mathieu Hauchecorne
Philippe Bezes, Florence Descamps, Sébastien Kott, Lucile Tallineau (dir.), L’invention de la gestion des finances publiques. Du contrôle de la dépense à la gestion des services publics (1914-1967)
Marc Leroy
Muriel Darmon, Classes préparatoires. La fabrique d’une jeunesse dominante
Xavier Pons
Baudoin Dupret, La charia. Des sources à la pratique, un concept pluriel
Julien Beaugé
Yves Gingras, Les dérives de l’évaluation de la recherche. Du bon usage de la bibliométrie
Camilo Argibay